Rhetoric—not evidence—dominates climate debate and policy.
By Kenneth Green, Fraser Institute, June 2025
Within the Western tradition, most people would likely agree that challenges such as those posed by man-made climate change are best addressed with pure reason. Risks would be assessed conservatively and objectively and handled using unbiased, pragmatic, effective, efficient control measures that could treat our “climate condition” without causing untoward side-effects such as economic destruction, political discord, social discord, and so on.
Instead, much of the discourse surrounding climate change seems intended to sow political and social discord more than to rationally understand and manage the risks of man-made climate change.… Read more