Posts

Wildfires can’t wait on ‘climate change’ policy

Politicians’ job is to prepare for emergencies, not avoid responsibility by blaming climate

By Andrew Roman, National Post, August 19, 2026

Summary: Wildfires are widely blamed on “climate change,” but the immediate cause is lack of adequate prevention and preparedness in mitigating wildfire risk. Blaming “climate change” lets politicians avoid accountability for not being adequately prepared for fires that are easily predictable. … Read more

‘Climate change’ isn’t taking food off your table

By BJORN LOMBORG, National Post, July 23, 2026

Summary: Climate change is not threatening everyday staples like coffee and olive oil, nor is it causing supply shortages and price increases. In fact, warming is increasing planetary greening and helping feed eight billion people.

These days, no morning ritual is safe from climate alarm. The journal Nature has just declared that coffee is “critically threatened by climate change” and described . scientists racing to save your espresso from “extinction.” … Read more

Elbows up: Canada’s destructive economic path

By Cornelis Van Kooten, Climate Realists of B.C., July 2026

Summary: Canada’s climate goals, including a national clean-energy grid and zero-polluting homes while excessive regulation strangles resource extraction and export, are economically unsustainable. Without resource exports, including fossil fuels, the country must rely on imports for goods and services, leading to inflation and increasing poverty. Furthermore, the focus on renewable energy sources like solar and wind is impractical.… Read more

Submission to the CleanBC Review Panel by Climate Realists of B.C.

In 2025, the B.C. government asked for submissions assessing its CleanBC climate policy. This is Climate Realists of B.C.’s response to this call for submissions.

By Patrick Hunt, President, Climate Realists of B.C., June 2025

The Terms of Reference for the CleanBC Review Panel reads:

“The Province is launching an independent review of CleanBC programs to ensure:

  1. they are effectively reducing emissions,
  2. while making life more affordable, and
  3. supporting a strong economy.”
… Read more

‘No business case’ for LNG? Justin Trudeau’s poor judgment costing Canada dearly

Scarcity of LNG due to Ukraine and Iran wars means many nations are hungry for our natural gas—if only we could supply it

By Geoff Russ, Energy Now Media, March 24, 2026

As missiles hit Gulf energy infrastructure and gas prices lurch upward, one of the most consequential Canadian policy judgments of recent years looks worse by the day.… Read more

Here comes the omnicult, courtesy of the Green Party

International Peace Charter solves the all world’s problems with the stroke of a pen!

By John Robson, Climate Nonsense, June 7, 2026

As we’ve noted, climate alarmism is in trouble on two key fronts. First, the supposedly solid science behind the panic is collapsing, and second, the supposedly easy policies to bring about a green energy transition are turning out not to work. … Read more

Trump post creates ‘psychiatric moment’ for media and its biased climate reporting

UN panel retires ‘bad news’ but unrealistic RCP8.5 scenario that media took as IPCC gospel to create unnecessary climate fears

By Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., Wall Street Journal, May 30, 2026

Many Americans still think the key question in climate politics is a human effect on climate, yea or nay, believer vs. denier.

No. For 40 years, the only interesting questions have been how and how much are we influencing the climate, and the cost and benefit of proposed actions—questions that can’t be answered by shouting yea or nay about a human role in climate change.… Read more

IPCC’s own model shows that carbon taxes won’t affect warming—but they will make us much poorer

MAGICC calculator reveals that cuts in carbon emissions will reduce ‘warming’ by a fraction of a degree Celsius, while globally costing trillions of dollars.

By Paul MacRae, Climate Realists of B.C., May 26, 2026

Summary

The IPCC’s MAGICC model shows that even with a 100% reduction in carbon emissions by developed nations, global warming would only be reduced by a minuscule 0.13°C by 2050. This tiny reduction comes at a staggering cost, with a McKinsey study estimating US$275 trillion globally by 2050. Instead of focusing on carbon taxes, we should be using our fossil-fuel wealth to develop adaptation strategies and gradually, over several decades, transition to other energy sources.

… Read more